Skip to main content
D. Connecticut· 9/24/2004

Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 338 F. Supp. 2d 328
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19632
  • 2004 WL 2227663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant forfeited his personal jurisdiction defense by consenting to a transfer without informing the court of his intention to assert a lack of personal jurisdiction defense upon transfer
  • holding property and note encumbered by security interests that exceeded their value were not assets under Connecticut's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
  • concluding savings clause was triggered when UCC-1 statements were filed as public records
  • identifying factors such as whether objecting party had previously requested that court take action in its favor
  • same when the information was immediately clear from a public filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Squatrito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.