Eplus Technology, Incorporated v. Patricia Aboud, A/K/A Carole Girard, and Daniel Jacques Akerib Jean-Marie Chartuny George Bernachawy John Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the independent personal stake exception applied when a conspirator’s aim was to profit by sending her employer into bankruptcy
• holding that the personal stake exception applied to a business owner that had siphoned money out of their own business and personally profited at the business’s expense in the process of an elaborate bankruptcy scheme
• finding that the predicate racketeering acts were not continuous in part because they did not occur over an extended period of time
• finding that sending false information to the forum state was sufficient to create personal jurisdiction for fraud claims
• concluding a corporate principal who committed fraudulent acts in Virginia was subject to personal jurisdiction
• noting that “the statutory definition of racketeering activity does not include common law fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).