Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that costs were excluded under an “arising out of” exclusion where the conduct underlying the first claim was a “but for” cause of the second claim
• applying “general insurance contract principles” “consistent with the laws of either New York or Illinois”
• affirming a Superior Court judgment that all the allegations against the plaintiff “‘come within the scope of the arising out of language,’ including ‘claims related to the use of [plaintiff’s drug].’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).