Skip to main content
· 12/23/1987

Eodice v. State

Citations

  • 742 S.W.2d 844
  • 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 9211
  • 1987 WL 34637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intent is a separate element and evidence relating to intent is irrelevant to determining whether, an object is a criminal instrument
  • no evidence that alleged ‘‘criminal instruments”— circuit tester, feeler gauge, and cotter pin— had been specially designed or made for use in commission of burglary
  • circuit tester used to disable burglar alarms and feeler gauge with a cotter pin used as a lock pick

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Brady, Aboussie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.