Skip to main content
· 5/12/2010

Envision Healthcare, Inc. v. Preferredone Insurance

Citations

  • 604 F.3d 983
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9668
  • 2010 WL 1875670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “classic example” does “not mean that abstention is limited to parallel proceedings”
  • upholding the district court’s judgment dismissing a federal declaratory-judgment action that “needlessly” interfered with pending state-court litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manion, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.