ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that appellate courts may independently evaluate the non-compete provisions to determine their meaning
• indicating that in an appellate court’s review of a trial court’s grant or denial of a temporary injunction based on the interpretation of a noncompete covenant, the court may independently evaluate the provisions to determine their meaning
• “[P]rotection of former customers generally does not qualify as a legitimate business interest where no identifiable agreement exists with such customers establishing that they would return with future work.”
• interpreting non-compete provision in similar fashion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).