· 7/27/1990
Environmental Defense Fund v. William K. Reilly, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors
Citations
- 909 F.2d 1497
- 285 U.S. App. D.C. 316
- 20 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21105
- 31 ERC (BNA) 1649
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12498
- 1990 WL 104188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, “should a district court on APA review find agency action defective, either substantively or procedurally, it ordinarily must remand to the agency for further proceedings”
- providing adequate remedy where alternative statute granted de novo review, more lenient standard of review, and provided court greater latitude in fashioning remedies
- \We need not and do not decide whether APA review would have been available to appellants had they chosen that route exclusively.\
- \Citizen participation is broadly permitted [under the TSCA] to ensure that bureaucratic lethargy does not prevent the appropriate administration of this vital authority.\ (quotation and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III, Wald, Ginsburg, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.