Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/22/1989

Environmental Defense Fund v. Thomas

Citations

  • 870 F.2d 892
  • 1989 WL 27475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for district court order directing Administrator to continue rule-making to formal decision
  • remanding for district court order directing Administrator to continue rulemaking to formal decision
  • \[T]he district court has jurisdiction under [section 7604] to compel the Administrator to perform purely ministerial acts....\
  • \[T]he district court has jurisdiction under [section 7604] to compel the Administrator to perform purely ministerial acts_\
  • “If the District of Columbia Circuit does not have jurisdiction ..., then either the district court has jurisdiction or [plaintiffs] have no forum in which to assert their claims.”
  • district court does not have jurisdiction to order Administrator to make particular revision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graafeiland, Mahoney, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases named Environmental Defense Fund v. Thomas

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.