Skip to main content
· 12/14/1972

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army

Citations

  • 473 F.2d 346
  • 3 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20001
  • 4 ERC (BNA) 1829
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6289
  • 4 ERC 1829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disagreeing with Corps’ conclusion that it need not study further an alternative that would require separate Con- gressional authorization
  • remand to District Court for decision if contracts could go ahead in face of general injunction
  • remand to the District Court for decision- if contracts could go ahead in face of general injunction
  • rejects argument that appropriations for project after an impact statement was filed makes the decision to complete the project a Congressional one not subject to review by the courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Stephenson, Bogue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.