Skip to main content
· 1/20/1987

Envall v. Independent School District No. 704

Citations

  • 399 N.W.2d 593
  • 37 Educ. L. Rep. 352
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 3977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that the stage of the proceeding is relevant to consider when determining whether a proposed amendment would be prejudicial
  • permitting the district court to consider stage of and delay to trial proceedings in deciding whether to grant motion to amend
  • to establish standing, party must show some personal stake in the outcome of controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.