Env Integrity Proj v. EPA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Of course, there is nothing objectionable in the Agency’s refusal to adopt its proposed amendments,” as “[o]ne logical outgrowth of a proposal is surely . . . to refrain from taking the proposed step” (quoting Am. Iron & Steel Inst. v. EPA, 886 F.2d 390, 400 (D.C. Cir. 1989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).