Enuka v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction of terroristic threat where defendant, after an enraged confrontation, angrily returned to the scene to tell the victim that he was a “dead man”
• threat to kill victim meets the definition of a terroristic threat
• threat to kill victim meets the definition of a terroristic threat
• The evidence was sufficient to sustain a terroristic threat conviction where it showed that, after an enraged and profane confrontation with the victim, the defendant angrily returned to the scene and told the victim that he was “a dead man.”
• The evidence was sufficient to sustain a terroristic threat conviction where it showed that, after an enraged and profane confrontation with the victim, the defendant angrily returned to the scene and told the victim that he was “a dead man.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).