Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Demartino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intended third-party beneficiary of release had standing to enforce the release because the language clearly released all persons from any and all claims arising from a particular incident
• deciding the presence of inconsistent “written and preprinted provisions” raises a question of fact about the intent of parties entering a liability release
• reiterating this court’s earlier holding that the intended third-party beneficiary of an insurance release has standing to enforce the release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).