Skip to main content
· 6/10/1975

Enterprise, Inc. v. Nampa City

Citations

  • 536 P.2d 729
  • 96 Idaho 734
  • 1975 Ida. LEXIS 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that for a public officer’s acts to be “arbitrary or capricious” or an “abuse of discretion,” it must be shown that he acted without a rational basis or in clear disregard of the facts and circumstances presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McQuade, Donaldson, Shepard, Scoggin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.