Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the government’s characterization of uncontested and contested damages as one claim was “overly restrictive, elevating form over substance, and does not comport with case law addressing similar situations”
• holding the government’s characterization of uncontested and contested damages as one claim was “overly restrictive, elevating form over substance, and does not comport with case law addressing similar situations”
• stating that “[o]ther courts in [the Federal Circuit] have found that [Rule] 54(b
• resolving the uncontested portion of the plaintiff’s damages even when other categories of damages were still in dispute
• resolving the uncontested portion of the plaintiff’s damages even when other categories of damages were still in dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).