Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/14/2014

Enter GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLC

Citations

  • 763 F.3d 1252
  • 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20189
  • 2014 WL 3953773
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that unit operator must satisfy SRHA preconditions before entry
  • explaining that unit operator must satisfy SRHA preconditions before entry
  • finding no privity between a predecessor and successor “when the parties to a litigation ending agreement could not have reasonably thought the deal would inure to the benefit of other parties and so protect their future claims”
  • discussing use of offensive issue preclusion against parties and their privies
  • discussing use of offensive issue preclusion against parties and their privies
  • “the operator may ... ‘reenter and occupy’ so much of the surface in the unitized area as may be ‘reasonably incident’ to extracting minerals from the unit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorsuch, Baldock, Bacharach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Enter GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.