Skip to main content
· 7/2/2014

Entela Ruga v. U.S. Attorney General

Citations

  • 757 F.3d 1193
  • 2014 WL 3031304
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the written warning on the 1-589 asylum application satisfies § 1158(d)(4)(A), rendering an oral warning by an IJ unnecessary
  • explaining that, when an peti- tioner fails to raise issues in their briefs, they have “abandoned them and they have no bearing on our decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.