E.N.T. Associates v. Collentine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating commissioner’s findings of fact are binding “if reasonable minds can draw different inferences from the evidence”
• stating the claimant carries the burden of establishing “an impairment or lessening of earning capacity”
• rejecting requirement for expert testimony to show change of condition in review-reopening proceeding
• “The claimant carries the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that, subsequent to the date of the award under review, he or she has suffered an impairment or lessening of earning capacity proximately caused by the original injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).