Ensink v. Mecosta County General Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary disposition was improper because the plaintiff established “damages stemming directly from [the] defendants’ negligence, and it is only the amount of damages that is in question”
• stating that lost profits are recoverable as damages on proper proof
• The Court agreed with the Fulton dissent and followed the majority’s interpretation only because it was bound to do so.
• “Recovery is not permitted in a tort action for remote, contingent, or speculative damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).