Ensign-Bickford Co. v. ICI EXPLOSIVES USA INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• basing personal jurisdiction on finding that the defendant had a “reasonable expectation” that the goods sold would “eventually arrive in Connecticut,” despite the contract terms
• emphasizing the “relatively short distance from the defendant’s principal place of business in Ontario, Canada, to the site of this litigation in Connecticut”
• “[T]he unfairness of forcing a foreign party to litigate in an unfamiliar legal system is alleviated here by the fact that the Canadian legal system is similar in many respects to the legal system in the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).