Enright v. Lehmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a noncontributing joint account holder can exercise dominion over the jointly held funds with the consent of the contributing account holder
• “Lehmann [debtor] asserts, and En-right [creditor] agrees, that Zandra [non-debtor] deposited all the money in the joint accounts.”
• discussing the interpretation of two statutes that potentially conflict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).