Enright v. Goodman Distribution, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although air conditioning condenser unit fell and hit plaintiff, he merely pushed the unit away, neither showed nor expressed any evidence of pain, then declined to report the accident or receive immediate treatment at a hospital
• upholding verdict of zero damages for past pain when physician testified that plaintiff is “a malingerer” because, despite evidence of post-accident bruising, jury was entitled to conclude that accident did not cause or aggravate plaintiff’s back problems or necessitate surgery
• “It follows that the fact of injury does not conclusively establish compensable physical pain in all circumstances.”
• “It follows that the fact of 16 injury does not conclusively establish compensable physical pain in all circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).