Skip to main content
· 4/7/1930

Enright

Citations

  • 40 F.2d 588
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3224
  • 1930 A.M.C. 907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a Title VII case, that “it was within the purview of the court’s discretion to determine whether or not the actual time expended by an additional attorney was reasonable”
  • holding, in a Title VII case, that “it was within the purview of the court's discretion to determine whether or not the actual time expended by an additional attorney was reasonable”
  • approving of 15% across the board reduction in hours because of excessive hours expended on contentious conduct between lead attorneys
  • determining that in the Eastern District of New York, the prevailing hourly rates for Title VII cases are $225 for a lead partner with twenty-four years experience and expertise in litigating discrimination cases, $135 for a fifth-year associate, and $50 for paralegals
  • upholding the rate of $225 per hour for an experienced and skillful partner in an employment discrimination case in the Eastern District of New York
  • affirming determination of district court for the Eastern District of New York that prevailing rate for partners is $200 and district court’s award of $225 per hour for partner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chase

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.