Enrica Cianci v. Pettibone Corp., Beardsley Piper Division, 1 James Hall, and Morris Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had no claim under FMLA because she had suffered no diminution in income and incurred no costs (continued...
• holding that plaintiff had no claim under FMLA be- cause she had suffered no diminution in income and incurred no costs as a result of alleged violation
• noting that “ ‘before seemingly stray workplace remarks will qualify as ... evidence of discrimination [under the direct method of proof], the plaintiff must show that the remarks were related to the employment decision in question’ ”
• finding as a factual matter that plaintiff who was fired before she took requested FMLA leave could not demonstrate preju- dice
• finding no damage claim under the FMLA when plaintiff suffered no actual monetary losses such as wages, salary, benefits, etc.
• finding as a factual matter that plaintiff who was fired before she took requested FMLA leave could not demonstrate preju- dice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).