Enovsys LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that inference of discrimination “is a ‘flexible [standard] that can be satisfied differently in differing factual scenarios.’” (quoting Chertkova v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 92 F.3d 81, 91 (2d Cir. 1996)
• “[T]o show that similarly situated individuals were treated differently . . . it is insufficient to offer little more than conclusory statements or sweeping allegations.”
• “[T]o show that similarly situated individuals were treated differently . . . it is insufficient to offer little more than conclusory statements or sweeping allegations unsupported by admissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).