Skip to main content
· 10/15/2013

Enos v. Union Stone, Inc.

Citations

  • 732 F.3d 45
  • 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2873
  • 2013 WL 5614103
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding district court’s choice of “an interest rate set out in the parties’ own agreement”
  • upholding district court's choice of \an interest rate set out in the parties' own agreement\
  • rejecting defendant's complaint about lack of explanation for prejudgment interest award where \it is apparent from the record that the amount was extrapolated from the rate stipulated in the CBA and recommended by the [plaintiffs]\
  • allowing lay testimony because “resolution of the case required nothing more complicated than reviewing Union Stone payroll records, identifying who the workers were, and applying the mathematical formula that is set forth in the CBA” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Stearns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.