Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/11/1981
Enock v. Reifer
Citations
- 437 A.2d 1245
- 293 Pa. Super. 141
- 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that since docket disclosed that prothonotary had not entered judgment as directed by court’s order and decision had not been reduced to judgment on praecipe of either party, appeal must be quashed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Shertz, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.