Enoc Miranda v. CSC Sugar, LLC
Syllabus
This is a premises liability case. Appellant, a construction worker, fell from scaffolding while working in Appellee's factory. Specifically, Appellant ran an extension cord across the warehouse floor to reach an electrical outlet to power a screw gun used to install new sheetrock required in the warehouse renovation. Appellee's employee drove a forklift over Appellant's extension cord, entangling the cord and dislodging the scaffolding. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee finding that there were no disputes of material fact and that Appellee had no duty to warn Appellant of a dangerous condition that Appellant created. Because there are material factual disputes that preclude the grant of summary judgment, we reverse and remand.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure apply in SVPA proceedings unless the SVPA specifically provides otherwise—thus allowing for motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Kenny Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.