Skip to main content
· 9/10/1969

Ennis W. Bradley v. United States

Citations

  • 420 F.2d 181
  • 136 U.S. App. D.C. 339
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • improper comment on failure to call witness whose testimony would have been self-incriminatory and subject to fifth amendment privilege
  • supplementary argument would have been appropriate
  • supplementary argument would have been appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Bazelon, Leventhal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.