Skip to main content
· 3/7/1995

Ennis v. Teague

Citations

  • 882 F. Supp. 1023
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5212
  • 1995 WL 235617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the movant had standing to seek a Rule 11 motion where the plaintiffs had moved to add the movant to an amended complaint
  • permitting a non- hands is an equitable principle that “generally has no application to an action at law for breach of contract.” Saggese v. Kelley, 445 Mass. 434, 444 (2005
  • plaintiffs motion to add insurer as a party for the purpose of coercing larger settlement offer proper subject for Rule 11 sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.