Skip to main content
· 9/4/1956

Ennis v. Stanley

Citations

  • 78 N.W.2d 114
  • 346 Mich. 296
  • 1956 Mich. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that absent actual knowledge of hostile claim, “the possession must be so open, visible, and notorious as to raise the presumption of notice to the world that the right of the true owner is invaded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr, Dethmers, Sharpe, Edwards, Boyles, Kelly, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.