Ennis v. Lott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s § 1983 claims premised on Fourteenth Amendment violations because “[t]he Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia”
• “Plaintiff’s [c]omplaint must ‘include some factual basis for the allegation of a municipal policy or custom.’” (quoting Hinson ex rel. N.H. v. Merritt Educ. Ctr., 521 F. Supp. 2d 22, 29 (D.D.C. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).