Skip to main content
· 9/23/1971

Engstrom v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 20 Cal. App. 3d 240
  • 97 Cal. Rptr. 484
  • 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[ujnless criminal conviction records of prosecution witnesses are made available to the defense, the defendant would be at a great disadvantage”
  • holding good cause requirement fulfilled when “defendant has disclosed his planned defense,” such that “there is no reason to doubt the good faith of his request for discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.