Engstrom v. Bayer Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that allowing cases to go forward in Philadelphia would create \needless legal complexity\ where the case raised a conflict of laws issue
• affirming trial court’s dismissal where dismissal was based in part on the need to engage in a conflict of laws analysis
• imposing jury duty and court costs on - 16 - J-A01032-23 communities with no relation to plaintiff’s claim weighs in favor of transferring case
• no reason the people of Philadelphia County should bear the burden of jury duty for a case with only tangential connections to Philadelphia County
• in an interstate case, stating that appellants who “insist that ... the application of the public and private factors test was error” incorrectly invoked the standard of review for intrastate questions of forum non conveniens
• “[t]here is simply no valid reason that the people of Philadelphia County should bear the burden of - 11 - J-A01021-18 adjudicating th[ese] case[s], including jury duty and the expense of conducting a trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).