English v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Rule 9(b) to MMPA claim based on defendant’s material omission that vehicle floorboards do not withstand normal exposure to elements, do not drain properly, and are susceptible to rust
• “A plaintiff must show the defendant failed to disclose material facts ‘known to him or her, or upon reasonable inquiry would [have been] known to him or her.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).