English v. State

Citations

• 80 Fla. 70

Syllabus

<p>Where E. using the name of J. sends a telegram to A. asking for a remittance of money by wire to J. and the remittance made by wire to J. is delivered to K., an accomplice of E., the receipt for the money being signed by K. in J.’s name, and the money delivered by K. to E., Jones knowing nothing of the transaction, in an information charging E. with larceny of the money, the ownership of the money was not improperly alleged to be in J., and E. having received the money through his concerted fraud, may be convicted of larceny.</p>