Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/30/1983
English v. State
Citations
- 647 S.W.2d 667
- 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that either expert testimony or lay testimony may be sufficient to support a deadly-weapon 8 finding
- holding that either expert testimony or lay testimony may be sufficient to support a deadly-weapon finding
- either expert or lay testimony may be sufficient to support deadly weapon finding by jury
- either expert or lay testimony may be sufficient to support deadly weapon finding by jury
- words and actions clearly implied that knife was capable of causing death and serious bodily injury
- \we assay the facts of a particular case to determine whether the manner of the weapon's use and intended use was such as to allow the jury to infer that the weapon was deadly\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-02-26· cited 280×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 252×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-11-26· cited 198×
- Good v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-26· cited 139×
- Matthew Ryan Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2012-12-19· cited 106×
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 93×
- Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 72×
- Charleston v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-11-02· cited 59×
- Banargent v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-31· cited 53×
- Webber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-16· cited 41×
- Romero v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-23· cited 41×
- Nash v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-01-25· cited 36×
- Quincy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-09-30· cited 34×
- Hammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 33×
- Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-07-17· cited 33×
- Stanul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-18· cited 32×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-05-04· cited 26×
- Nash v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-08-05· cited 20×
- Vela v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-10-12· cited 19×
- Tucker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2007-03-15· cited 16×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 1,585×
- Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-13· cited 182×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-03· cited 148×
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-23· cited 69×
- Janicek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-09· cited 66×
- Dominique v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-07· cited 58×
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-25· cited 21×
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-06· cited 19×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.