English v. Ross
Citations
- 140 F. 630
- 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy — Voidable Preference — Knowledge of Creditor.</p> <p>Where all the facts known to a creditor pointed to his debtor being insolvent, which was the fact, the creditor is chargeable with knowledge that a transfer to him as security of practically all of the debtor’s available property, within four months prior to the latter’s bankruptcy, was intended to give him a preference, and such transfer is voidable, under Banlcr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 60b, 30 Stat. 562 [U. S. Comp. St 1901, p. 3445.]</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point see vol. 6, Cent. Dig. Bankruptcy, §§ 255, 257.]</p> <p>2. Same — Preference Effected by Deed Intended As Security — Act Pa.</p> <p>June 8, 1881 — Deeds and Mortgages — Recording Acts of Pennsylvania — Right of Trustee to Question Transaction — Section 60a Bankr. Act 1898 As Amended February 5, 1903 — Date As of Which Transfer to be Adjudged a Preference.</p> <p>Conveyances of real estate absolute on their face were executed by the debtor to his creditor, the one April 21, 1894, and the other July 30, 1900. Both were admittedly given as security for existing and subsequently accruing indebtedness, and with other securities, also transferred to the creditor, constituted practically all the available property of the debtor. The conveyances were not recorded until June 2, 1903, at which time the grantor was insolvent, and must have been known to have been so by such creditor. Four days later involuntary proceedings in bankruptcy were instituted against the grantor, and he was subsequently adjudicated a bankrupt. On a bill by the trustee to have the conveyances set aside as a preference, held:</p> <p>(a) That, although given as security merely, the Pennsylvania act of June 8, 1881 (P. L. 84), prohibiting a deed absolute on its face*from being reduced to a mortgage, except by a defeasance in writing, signed, sealed, and delivered by the grantor at the time and recorded within 60 days, prevented the said conveyances from being
Judges: Archbald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loeser v. Savings Deposit Bank & Trust Co.Sixth Circuit· 1906-11-22· cited 27×
- Benner v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court· 1913-05-07· cited 22×
- Long v. Farmers' State BankEighth Circuit· 1906-06-25· cited 16×
- Debus v. YatesE.D. Kentucky· 1910-08-17· cited 12×
- Mattley v. GieslerEighth Circuit· 1911-04-24· cited 10×
- United States v. KudasikW.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-06-08· cited 6×
- Bowler v. First National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-10-30· cited 6×
- Barrett v. KaiglerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1917-06-14· cited 5×
- Stover v. Valley Nat. Bank of ChambersburgThird Circuit· 1931-03-10· cited 5×
- In re BirdD. Minnesota· 1910-06-27· cited 4×
- Conners v. Bucksport Nat. BankD. Maine· 1914-03-16· cited 4×
- Ragan v. DonovanN.D. Ohio· 1911-03-11· cited 3×
- Farnsworth v. Union Trust & Deposit Co.Fourth Circuit· 1921-03-07· cited 1×
- In re SheelyM.D. Pennsylvania· 1930-08-05
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 259×
- Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court· 1880-02-18· cited 122×
- Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court· 1905-04-17· cited 116×
- In re New York Economical Printing Co.Second Circuit· 1901-08-22· cited 65×
- In re Pekin Plow Co.Eighth Circuit· 1901-11-18· cited 31×
- Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerFourth Circuit· 1903-05-05· cited 30×
- Davey v. RuffellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-07-11· cited 29×
- In re ShirleySixth Circuit· 1901-12-05· cited 25×
- Mellon's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 15×
- Fries v. NullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-05-08· cited 11×
- Sundheim v. Ridge Avenue BankE.D. Pennsylvania· 1905-07-08· cited 11×
- Burkhart v. Farmers' Union Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-07-28· cited 10×
- In re KlingamanS.D. Iowa· 1900-05-22· cited 10×
- Dean v. PlaneIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-02-21· cited 9×
- In re MoodyN.D. Iowa· 1904-08-15· cited 9×
- Sankey v. HawleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-03-19· cited 8×
- Johnston v. Huff, Andrews & Moyler Co.Fourth Circuit· 1904-11-15· cited 8×
- In re LukensE.D. Pennsylvania· 1905-06-02· cited 8×
- Moran v. MunhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-01-05· cited 7×
- Fries v. NullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-10-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.