English v. Gamble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had not established general jurisdiction where he did not allege facts related to the enumerated factors
• concluding that defendant’s call to plaintiff’s attorney in the forum state did not support the exercise of personal jurisdiction
• holding that the plaintiff had not established general jurisdiction where he did not allege facts related to these factors
• “[T]he mere foreseeability of causing injury in another state is not a sufficient benchmark for exercising personal jurisdiction.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[I]t is not in the interest of justice to transfer where a plaintiff either realized or should have realized that the forum in which he or she filed was improper.”
• no abuse of discretion in refusing to permit amendment of pretrial order to assert fraud claim against defendant where only negligent misrepresentation claim had been asserted against that defendant but both claims were asserted against other defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).