Engleman v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the usual presumption of the public’s right of access is rebutted when a party attaches a sealed discovery document to a non-disposi-tive motion
• “when a party attaches a sealed discovery document to a nondispositive motion, the usual presumption of the public’s right of access is rebutted”
• “when a party attaches a sealed discovery document to a nondispositive motion, the usual presumption of the public’s right of access is rebutted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).