Skip to main content
· 4/26/1869

Engleman v. Central National Bank

Citations

  • 3 Ky. Op. 132
  • 1869 Ky. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether the amendment would prejudice the defendants by requiring them to “expend additional resources to defend against new claims” citing Troxel Mfg. Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co., 489 F.2d 968, 971 (6th Cir. 1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.