Englebert Gesink v. Grand Lodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \nothing in the legislative history of Title III indicates an intent to protect the positions of union officers and employees\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• P.J. Thompson, Phillip R. Pope v. Office and Professional Employees International Union, Afl-Cio
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-02-08· cited 28×
• Vikman v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 1269
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-01-30· cited 19×
• UnióN De Empleados De Muelles De P.R., Inc. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n
  First Circuit· 2018-02-28· cited 13×
• Ray Stevens v. Northwest Indiana District Council
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-03-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Finnegan v. Leu
  Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 334×
• John D. Higgins, Jr., and Cross-Appellant v. Richard Harden, and Cross-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-05-11· cited 25×
• Eugene Sullivan v. Laborers' International Union of North America Iowa Laborers' District Council
  Eighth Circuit· 1983-05-12· cited 24×
• Adams-Lundy v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-04-30· cited 19×
• Gesink v. Grand Lodge, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-10-15· cited 13×