England v. Reinauer Transportation Companies, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find testimony on direct was sufficient to open the door to inadmissible evidence
• distinguishing Fitzgerald, and upholding the exclusion of evidence of insurance payments, where plaintiff’s testimony “was not sufficient to imply that he was suffering such financial difficulties as to negate impliedly the receipt of any additional benefits”
• “When a case is being heard in federal 7 court, the evidentiary, as opposed to the substantive, aspects of the collateral source rule are 8 governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence, particularly Rules 401, 402, and 403”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).