England v. Marriott International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing simultaneous § 1132(a)(1)(B) and § 1132(a)(3) claims where plaintiffs sought reformation of retirement deferred stock bonus awards under § 1132(a)(3), a remedy not available under § 1132(a)(1)(B
• allowing simultaneous § 502(a)(1)(B) and § 502(a)(3) claims where plaintiffs § 502(a)(3
• allowing the plaintiff to pursue claims under both section 1132(a)(1)(B) and 1132(a)(3) because the remedy sought under section 1132(a)(3) - the reformation of the terms of the benefit awards - was not available under section 1132(a)(1)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).