Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 5/30/1997

England v. Horbach

Citations

  • 944 P.2d 340
  • 318 Utah Adv. Rep. 14
  • 1997 Utah LEXIS 48
  • 1997 WL 283291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the parties were mutually mistaken in their belief that the debtor owed the creditor $25,000, there was not \a compromise to satisfy an uncertain debt\ and an accord and satisfaction did not occur
  • indicating that trial court may look to timeliness in making a rule 15(b) decision under the permissive prong of the analysis
  • noting that second half of rule 15(b) analysis only comes into play \[ilf evidence is objected to at trial\ (emphasis added) (alteration in original) (quotations omitted)
  • \[There could have been no accord and satisfaction ... because the first element of accord and satisfaction-the existence of a bona fide dispute or uncertainty over an un-liquidated amount-was not present.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart, Howe, Russon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named England v. Horbach

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.