Skip to main content
· 2/16/1995

Engineering Dynamics, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Structural Software, Inc., and S. Rao Guntur

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 408
  • 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1157
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3126
  • 1995 WL 65269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting substantial similarity between the two works is required for the “second and usually more difficult question [of] whether the copying is legally actionable” but focusing on whether the computer manuals and data cards at issue were protected under the Copyright Act
  • “Available in small, medium, large, and x-large for dogs of all breeds and sizes
  • “Available in small, medium, large, and x-large for dogs of all breeds and sizes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Jolly, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.