Skip to main content
· 6/29/1982

Engelmann v. Westergard

Citations

  • 647 P.2d 385
  • 98 Nev. 348
  • 1982 Nev. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court had equitable power to consider appeal; question of whether diligent protection of water rights occurred was properly before district court when water rights holder had no notice of cancellation
  • \[T]he doctrine of exhaustion of remedies does not require one to initiate and participate in proceedings ... which are vain and futile.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Manoukian, Springer, Mowbray, Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.