Veterans Claims· 9/16/1997
Engelke v. Gober
Citations
- 10 Vet. App. 396
- 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 738
- 1997 WL 572191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Court reviews the Board's determinations of whether a veteran's conduct constituted \good cause\ under the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review
- stating that Patterson relied on dicta found in Locomotive Engineers to hold that judicial review may be available where a motion for reconsideration alleges \new evidence\ or \changed circumstances\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Nebeker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manning v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 2002-12-19· cited 22×
- Flores v. NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2005-03-08· cited 6×
- Rosalia A. Flores v. R. James NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2006-03-08
- Anthony R. McGee, Jr. v. Robert L. WilkieVeterans Claims· 2019-08-20
- Louann Wolfe v. Robert L. WilkieVeterans Claims· 2020-08-31
- Schutte v. GoberFederal Circuit· 2001-01-12
- Carmen L. Encarnacion v. Denis McDonoughVeterans Claims· 2023-05-18
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1990-10-12· cited 2,831×
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 453×
- Owens v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-03-14· cited 156×
- James P. Mayer, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsFederal Circuit· 1994-11-25· cited 86×
- Struck v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1996-05-14· cited 49×
- Losh v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1993-12-20· cited 23×
- Patterson v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1993-07-30· cited 21×
- Romero v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-04-15· cited 12×
- Brown v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-06-22· cited 7×
- McCall v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-02-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.