Skip to main content
· 12/31/1975

Engelcke v. Stoehsler

Citations

  • 544 P.2d 582
  • 273 Or. 937
  • 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1006
  • 1975 Ore. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating principle under former ORS 16.390, repealed by Or Laws 1979, ch 284, § 199
  • where it was held that parol evidence may be used to show that a check was not to be operative until the satisfaction of a condition precedent in a suit between the original parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.