Skip to main content
· 11/9/2007

Engel v. Rapid City School District

Citations

  • 506 F.3d 1118
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26126
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,011
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1808
  • 2007 WL 3307752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even though the employer’s first remedial response did not end harassment of the victim by the same coworker, the remedial response was still adequate
  • employer’s response to known harasser was reasonably calculated even though it was ineffective
  • “Proper remedial action need be only reasonably calculated to stop the harassment, and remedial action that does not end the harassment can still be adequate if it is reasonably calculated to do so.”
  • genuine issue of material fact whether the employer was on actual notice of the risk to the plaintiffs from a known serial harasser even though employer had taken adequate remedial action in response to a prior complaint by another victim
  • addressing continued harassment by same individual after employer's remedial efforts
  • describing our standard as one of negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Arnold, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.